Navigation

    M5Stack Community

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Search
    1. Home
    2. tokuhira
    T
    • Continue chat with tokuhira
    • Start new chat with tokuhira
    • Flag Profile
    • Profile
    • Following
    • Followers
    • Blocks
    • Topics
    • Posts
    • Best
    • Groups
    Save
    Saving

    tokuhira

    @tokuhira

    0
    Reputation
    17
    Posts
    2054
    Profile views
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online

    tokuhira Follow

    Posts made by tokuhira

    • RE: M5StickC/ATOM on MacOS Catalina can't upload/ ESP32: Timed out waiting for packet header solution (Solved)

      @m5stack

      Hi, I have two M5Stick-Cs purchased in the same lot, one succeeded in updating this firmware, the other failed. The error display is as follows. Is there any countermeasure?

      % ./Updater_FW20200422

      ==================== M5 Serial Converter Firmware Updater ====================

      FW Version: ft232_OD_20200422
      :
      :
      

      ==========================================================================

      Press enter to continue . . .

      Detecting M5Stack products.
      Find M5Stack products.
      Kernel driver deteched.
      Apply magic success.
      Waiting for device in DFU mode...
      Find M5Stack device in DFU mode.
      Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "m5stick_firmware_upgrader_OD_20200422.py", line 97, in <module>
      File "site-packages/usb/core.py", line 869, in set_configuration
      File "site-packages/usb/core.py", line 102, in wrapper
      File "site-packages/usb/core.py", line 148, in managed_set_configuration
      File "site-packages/usb/backend/libusb1.py", line 794, in set_configuration
      File "site-packages/usb/backend/libusb1.py", line 595, in _check
      usb.core.USBError: [Errno None] Other error
      [6711] Failed to execute script m5stick_firmware_upgrader_OD_20200422
      %

      posted in Official Updates
      T
      tokuhira
    • RE: Is the Echo revision identifiable?

      We may be able to identify this revision by the serial number specified on the package. Mine seems to be a lot manufactured in June 2020.
      0_1601357654307_fullsizeoutput_7cc.jpeg

      posted in Atom
      T
      tokuhira
    • Please let us know the recommended contact length for the pin header!

      Most of the pin headers that I can easily obtain have a contact length of 6 mm. However, it seems a bit too long for the pin socket on the bottom of ATOM.

      What is the recommended contact length based on ATOM's design?

      Is there a concern that the socket on the ATOM side will be damaged by continuing to use it with a gap as shown in the attached photo?
      0_1600658894415_Wdg2GwkeS1ezcTUV6nGFWQ.jpg

      posted in Atom
      T
      tokuhira
    • RE: Is the Echo revision identifiable?

      @world101 Thanks for nice link to inside shots! Certainly it says V1.0. On the other hand, I compared the appearance such as stickers, but I could not find any difference.

      posted in Atom
      T
      tokuhira
    • Is the Echo revision identifiable?

      Thank you for establishing the ATOM category.

      Please tell me if the sticker on the back is EXACTLY the same for my Echo and your Echo. If possible, also the version of the PCB inside.

      0_1599972443987_fullsizeoutput_7c6.jpeg
      0_1599972472459_fullsizeoutput_7c5.jpeg

      posted in Atom
      T
      tokuhira
    • RE: The URL sent from the forum to confirm the mail address, goes 404.

      @ajb2k3 , Thanks for your interesting.

      1st, open the confirmation link with Safari on iPhone -> nginx 404
      2nd, open the confirmation link with Safari on macOS -> nginx 404
      3rd, open modified HTTPS link with Safari on macOS -> Confirmed (reached to 200)
      After that, open both the original HTTP link and modified HTTPS link with any -> invalid token (reached to 200)

      posted in General
      T
      tokuhira
    • RE: The URL sent from the forum to confirm the mail address, goes 404.

      Umm. Even if I try it now, I can't reproduce it. At that time, I was in trouble because I couldn't break through 404.

      posted in General
      T
      tokuhira
    • The URL sent from the forum to confirm the mail address, goes 404.

      The URL in the email to confirm your account email address is incorrect. Since HTTP is specified, it leads to 404 Not Found. Shouldn't HTTPS be specified?

      posted in General
      T
      tokuhira
    • How to identify hardware revisions of the ATOM Echo

      Hi, I've heard rumors that the ATOM Echo has an early version and a modified version. If so, is it possible to tell from the appearance of the package or body? Also, is there a way to know using software as a workaround? If nothing can be done, is there no choice but to open it and check it with a tester?

      The fix I'm hearing is eliminating the mismatch between speaker ratings and amplifier output. I would like to know if there are any other corrections.

      Anyway, I want the ATOM category under PRODUCTS.

      posted in PRODUCTS
      T
      tokuhira
    • RE: Error on downloading to M5StickC

      The error has been solved myself.
      It seems that the baud rate 921600 does not supported by M5StickC.
      1.5M might be best by modified "boards.txt."

      posted in M5 Stick/StickC
      T
      tokuhira